Skip to content

EPSRC “damaging” science. What’s your solution?

January 12, 2012

A group of more than 70 scientists yesterday wrote to the government to say that the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) is “making disastrous errors” that are “damaging scientific discovery in Britain”.

One of the central complaints is the EPSRC’s requirement that grant applicants predict the impact of their work in 10 to 50 years’ time. Many commentators, including those posting on the Daily Telegraph website, argue that predicting impact in this way is silly.

Philip Ball wrote recently in the Guardian about the h-index, which most people would agree does not present a nuanced picture of a scientist’s worth.

So what are the alternative grant application questions? In a process that must be as scientific and fair as possible, how would you divvy up the cash?

2 Comments leave one →
  1. May 14, 2012 6:37 am

    Wow! I wonder what can they suggest to solve the problem? Complaining is not a decision. And what kind of disastrous errors EPSRC is making? Quite interesting! Thank you for your post.

Leave a Reply to Adam Smith Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: